Radar Telegram Open Radar

The Ministry of the Supreme Authority (may it live long) responds to a referendum on the banning of the hijab in schools in an Islamic country. Question: If a uniform was implemented in white schools in an Islamic country, and female students wearing hijab were prevented from entering, and veiled teachers were prevented from entering and teaching, thereby causing significant damage or serious embarrassment. Will the same ruling apply to them in non-Islamic countries if the hijab is banned in their schools? That is, they must maintain the Islamic hijab as much as possible - cover most of the head hair with a hat, for example, and cover the entire neck up to the chin by wearing a long-necked dress (shirt). And don't leave except as much as necessary. Is this their ruling or is it different from what was mentioned? The answer: personal need is not enough if a serious specific negative results in complying with the obligation to leave the hijab, which harms the cultural identity of the society and the persistence of the authorities in their attempts to erase its Islamic traditions. This should be taken into account. And to God he is the complainer. From the website of the Supreme Authority Office (Yashtselo Tselo).

du_xf · Source

The Ministry of the Supreme Authority (may it live long) responds to a referendum on the banning of the hijab in schools in an Islamic country. Question: If a uniform was implemented in white schools in an Islamic country, and female students wearing hijab were prevented from entering, and veiled teachers were prevented from entering and teaching, thereby causing significant damage or serious embarrassment. Will the same ruling apply to them in non-Islamic countries if the hijab is banned in their schools? That is, they must maintain the Islamic hijab as much as possible - cover most of the head hair with a hat, for example, and cover the entire neck up to the chin by wearing a long-necked dress (shirt). And don't leave except as much as necessary. Is this their ruling or is it different from what was mentioned? The answer: personal need is not enough if a serious specific negative results in complying with the obligation to leave the hijab, which harms the cultural identity of the society and the persistence of the authorities in their attempts to erase its Islamic traditions. This should be taken into account. And to God he is the complainer. From the website of the Supreme Authority Office (Yashtselo Tselo).

The Ministry of the Supreme Authority (may it live long) responds to a referendum on the banning of the hijab in schools in an Islamic country. Question: If a uniform was implemented in white schools in an Islamic country, and female students wearing hijab were prevented from entering, and veiled teachers were prevented from entering and teaching, thereby causing significant damage or serious embarrassment. Will the same ruling apply to them in non-Islamic countries if the hijab is banned in their schools? That is, they must maintain the Islamic hijab as much as possible - cover most of the head hair with a hat, for example, and cover the entire neck up to the chin by wearing a long-necked dress (shirt). And don't leave except as much as necessary. Is this their ruling or is it different from what was mentioned? The answer: personal need is not enough if a serious specific negative results in complying with the obligation to leave the hijab, which harms the cultural identity of the society and the persistence of the authorities in their attempts to erase its Islamic traditions. This should be taken into account. And to God he is the complainer. From the website of the Supreme Authority Office (Yashtselo Tselo).

Share on WhatsApp Join our Telegram channel