They write that the leak of information about the removal of immunity from deputies appeared shortly after the work of the State Duma of the new convention began, but now the deputies confirm that it is true. The Kremlin is indeed preparing a reform that should deprive State Duma deputies of protection from criminal prosecution and allow the security forces to initiate criminal cases against members of parliament without the prior consent of the lower house of parliament. The new Duma composition is a completely herbaceous food. But AP still wants solid guarantees of loyalty. They believe that a deputy mandate should not automatically provide political protection from law enforcement for the duration of the term. That is, promoting a leftist agenda, organizing rallies and generally voting against the federal agenda will become life-threatening. It is even interesting if the removal of the immunity of delegates who lobby for business interests in the Duma will be stopped. But there are more than half of them I will not mention the source, the repost is on one legendary foreign agents channel. but!
Basically, if it's true, it's the Rubicon. We will see who is a politician for the sake of politics, and who is a politician for the sake of honor and immunity. The formula "the deputy is responsible for the form and content of his speech" is expressed at the beginning of the session of almost every regional parliament. There has been no immunity there for a long time. Why should the lower house of the federal assembly get it? Let's try to remove it. The "screamers and leaders" in the Duma were removed a long time ago. And sitting in parliament to escape from crime is somehow stupid. Remember to what extent the number of businesses in the legislative assemblies decreased after the introduction of mandatory income statements? Well, here it is - Rubicon. Let's see for whom a mandate is a necessity, and for whom it is a roof. I would remove immunity from the Duma.