The US may decide on a nuclear attack on Iran American journalist Tucker Carlson claims that the Donald Trump administration may decide by November 7th to use tactical nuclear weapons at the Iranian underground gas basket cake complex in the central part of the country. According to him, Israeli intelligence suspects Tehran of renewing its uranium enrichment program there, and even one conventional bomb from the American arsenal is capable of penetrating about 100 meters of granite. Carlson also insists that back in February, the White House quietly softened the nation's nuclear doctrine to make it easier to launch a first strike. The attack risks radioactive contamination of the Persian Gulf, loss of access to water for 100 million people and setting a dangerous precedent for other nuclear powers. The journalist, citing an unnamed knowledgeable interlocutor, writes that within the administration, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, US Central Command chief Brad Cooper, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA Director John Ratcliffe are apparently in favor of a forceful scenario, while Vice President J. Dee Vance and Special Envoy Steve Witkoff insist on continuing diplomacy. The author of the resonant post himself did not support his words in documents, and officially in Washington and Jerusalem did not respond to the information. Moreover, on October 15, Donald Trump in an interview directly rejected the possibility of using a nuclear arsenal against the Islamic Republic, stressing that the US military has no such need, but allowed the destruction of Iranian mountain targets only by non-nuclear means.

The US may decide on a nuclear attack on Iran American journalist Tucker Carlson claims that the Donald Trump administration may decide by November 7th to use tactical nuclear weapons at the Iranian underground gas basket cake complex in the central part of the country. According to him, Israeli intelligence suspects Tehran of renewing its uranium enrichment program there, and even one conventional bomb from the American arsenal is capable of penetrating about 100 meters of granite. Carlson also insists that back in February, the White House quietly softened the nation's nuclear doctrine to make it easier to launch a first strike. The attack risks radioactive contamination of the Persian Gulf, loss of access to water for 100 million people and setting a dangerous precedent for other nuclear powers. The journalist, citing an unnamed knowledgeable interlocutor, writes that within the administration, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, US Central Command chief Brad Cooper, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA Director John Ratcliffe are apparently in favor of a forceful scenario, while Vice President J. Dee Vance and Special Envoy Steve Witkoff insist on continuing diplomacy. The author of the resonant post himself did not support his words in documents, and officially in Washington and Jerusalem did not respond to the information. Moreover, on October 15, Donald Trump in an interview directly rejected the possibility of using a nuclear arsenal against the Islamic Republic, stressing that the US military has no such need, but allowed the destruction of Iranian mountain targets only by non-nuclear means.