Can letter writing prevent another war? A university professor's assessment of American letter writing and the need for a comprehensive agreement instead of a temporary agreement Diplomacy between Tehran and Washington is on the edge of an abyss in the shadow of correspondence, regional movements and the continuation of military threats, and raised the question of whether diplomacy can prevent another war. In this context, Sasan Karimi, a professor at the University of Tehran, in analyzing Mohsen Razai's choice to accept J.J.'s letter. Dee Vance, US Vice President, believes that after the disruption in the previous communication channel, Washington evaluated the Secretary of the Supreme Council for National Security as more suitable for the operational monitoring of the war, considering the issues of defense and negotiations. Regarding the goals of the Trump administration, he emphasizes that Washington is looking for a quick and limited interim agreement on the eve of the midterm elections to achieve political gains. According to Karimi, partial and multi-stage agreements do not meet Iran's long-term interests, and Tehran should not sacrifice its interests for US election considerations. Instead, he must present a comprehensive and sustainable plan with initiative. This international relations expert points out that a temporary agreement does not necessarily prevent war, but what does prevent war is an unbreakable agreement based on genuine exchange of points that can create stable interests and neutralize warlike motives. Full text Read more: The Channel Economists Club.