The management of financial affairs in the country was done due to a lack of education. Fatima Nasiri Muhammad Ali Musharraf Nafisi was an economist and one of the managers and economic experts of the Pahlavi period, who was active in the field of finances and budgets of the country for many years. In his memoirs, comparing the budget of 1301 and 1320, he points to the sharp growth of government expenditures and the consequences of fiscal and tax policies on people's lives and writes: "In 1301, when Iran's first regular budget was prepared after the end of the war, the total amount of the state's revenues and expenditures was 206 million Rials. In the first year of 1320, the Ministry of Finance had a budget of 4300 million Rials, which is almost twenty times the budget of the 18 years before the expenditure and without this budget also taken into account. The country's reserves It is clear that the wealth and tax capacity of the country's residents have not increased 20-fold in these 18 years, even considering the decline in the purchasing power of money. Comparing these two figures shows to what extent the management of financial affairs in the country was conducted due to lack of study. He continues in this context: "The consequences of this policy were the disruption of the lives of the residents of the country. This huge income was collected from three sources: direct taxes, indirect taxes and monopolies. The amount of direct taxes collected by the government was not high and did not exceed the capacity of the taxpayers. It was found that the direct pressure did not exceed ten per cent towards the government monopolies, and since these two sources of income were imposed on expenses, they forced the cost of living to rise, and the rise was more pronounced for the poorer classes. # The economy of the channel.

The management of financial affairs in the country was done due to a lack of education. Fatima Nasiri Muhammad Ali Musharraf Nafisi was an economist and one of the managers and economic experts of the Pahlavi period, who was active in the field of finances and budgets of the country for many years. In his memoirs, comparing the budget of 1301 and 1320, he points to the sharp growth of government expenditures and the consequences of fiscal and tax policies on people's lives and writes: "In 1301, when Iran's first regular budget was prepared after the end of the war, the total amount of the state's revenues and expenditures was 206 million Rials. In the first year of 1320, the Ministry of Finance had a budget of 4300 million Rials, which is almost twenty times the budget of the 18 years before the expenditure and without this budget also taken into account. The country's reserves It is clear that the wealth and tax capacity of the country's residents have not increased 20-fold in these 18 years, even considering the decline in the purchasing power of money. Comparing these two figures shows to what extent the management of financial affairs in the country was conducted due to lack of study. He continues in this context: "The consequences of this policy were the disruption of the lives of the residents of the country. This huge income was collected from three sources: direct taxes, indirect taxes and monopolies. The amount of direct taxes collected by the government was not high and did not exceed the capacity of the taxpayers. It was found that the direct pressure did not exceed ten per cent towards the government monopolies, and since these two sources of income were imposed on expenses, they forced the cost of living to rise, and the rise was more pronounced for the poorer classes. # The economy of the channel.