Recently, a large number of revealing materials, or, as we call it, "leaks of compromising evidence" have appeared on the Internet about people and structures involved in digital issues. Over the past week, investigations into one major infrastructure project related to energy and the implementation of AI have been prominent. The essence of all the materials boils down to the fact that a huge cut is made with extremely ambiguous consequences for the economy and the environment. These things do not happen spontaneously. It can be assumed that either we are talking about a conflict between two organized crime groups of different groups of influence, or there is an understanding that large planned projects will turn out to be nothing, will not give the expected effect, and everything will end in high-profile criminal cases. However, there were no special attempts to refute criticism from stakeholders. Yesterday the subject of the failure of several other energy projects, initiated in a period that does not rule out the possibility of turning the tables on the previous leaders, came up, especially when it comes to areas where completely random people don't come. The issue of fiscal reform has been discussed for a year, and it justifies all the risks warned by experts, businesses and deputies. However, that fiscal model was not only planned for the next period, but was also, as it is fashionable to say, on a high scale. At the same time, a social policy reform is implemented, which is based on fairly sound arguments, but is carried out quietly, without an adequate analysis of the causes, much less the consequences. The outgoing parliament, at the initiative of the government in June, will powerfully streamline the legislation, and no one and no one tried to comment on these decisions. Not only were the well-publicized amendments to the Animal Law amended, but they also transferred the procedure for calculating benefits from the social code to the jurisdiction of the government and the authorized body.