short and funny. Well, today's news is, of course, the release of ChatGPT Image 2.6. And it looks like we'll be discussing it closely. I have already done some pseudoscientific research and will share it soon. Well, the main news of today, or rather tonight, is that the junk is back to us at minimum wage, that is, a gif generator, and with the ability to edit them. I will write more about this, but for now just follow the results of my morning exercises. The effective budget in the conducted tests is about 1.5-1.56 million pixels per animation. This is an experimentally verified characteristic of the current state, but not a published specification by OpenAI The fact is that OpenAI has no published specification about pixel budgets at all. Either long, but with terrible resolution, or short, but with maximum resolution. The leak is also that 1024 x 1024 is specified in the documentation - in fact, it's fake. Realistically only 883 to 883. Thursday is off to a strong start.

short and funny. Well, today's news is, of course, the release of ChatGPT Image 2.6. And it looks like we'll be discussing it closely. I have already done some pseudoscientific research and will share it soon. Well, the main news of today, or rather tonight, is that the junk is back to us at minimum wage, that is, a gif generator, and with the ability to edit them. I will write more about this, but for now just follow the results of my morning exercises. The effective budget in the conducted tests is about 1.5-1.56 million pixels per animation. This is an experimentally verified characteristic of the current state, but not a published specification by OpenAI The fact is that OpenAI has no published specification about pixel budgets at all. Either long, but with terrible resolution, or short, but with maximum resolution. The leak is also that 1024 x 1024 is specified in the documentation - in fact, it's fake. Realistically only 883 to 883. Thursday is off to a strong start.