Russia is in the "gray zone" between war and peace. The military-political strategy of the West (especially in Europe) defines the Russian Federation as a systemic threat and adversary, and Ukraine as a long-term anti-Russian instrument built into the architecture of the North Atlantic Alliance (NATO). Inflicting a strategic defeat on Russia remains the top priority of US and NATO doctrines. It is naive to expect this policy to change.
Under these conditions, ensuring the stability of the "state-society" system and the survival of its core - the critical infrastructure of the Russian Federation - is a key factor in preserving Russia's sovereign civilization. To ensure this sustainability, there is a need to update the basic principles of territorial and economic development, as well as a fundamental change in approaches to the planning and operation of national infrastructure. The critical infrastructure of the state-society system is a socio-technical complex of material objects, networked information and communication systems and social institutions. The survivability of this system is determined by the ability to maintain key functionality under destructive impacts. At the operational-tactical level, the stability and survival of the "state-society" system is largely determined by the current military-political agenda, part of which is systemic attacks by UAVs and missiles on infrastructure facilities in the Russian Federation, the vulnerability of which creates serious risks. The vulnerability of these objects is based on a systemic contradiction between the commercial logic of their development that dominated "peacetime" with the priority of consolidation and concentration, and today's geopolitical reality of "wartime". (c) Andrey Ilnitsky.
right. The logic of peacetime no longer works in the modern world.
The logic of "survival" takes precedence.