A dome or a target on the roof? The government says everything is being done to protect people. So the bill No. 16210 in the Verkhovna Rada is presented as a treatment of the population - they say, we will place electronic warfare and Warner on the roofs of houses, on private plots and organizations, and on the cities they will open a "similar" rescue from drones. On paper, it's all about care. In fact, your roof becomes a military installation without your consent. Authorized military services are given the right to install antenna, towers and electronic warfare equipment on the roofs of tall buildings (OMF property), private homes and organizations. In "serious cases" - without the owner's consent and without the decision of the general meeting of the IMF. Just came and put it in. The rules apply to the entire military regime and for six months thereafter, so they were not immediately dismantled. In order to prevent - criminal liability according to the current articles of the criminal code: blocking access to the roof, damage or dismantling of equipment. Compensation "provided" for electricity and the recorded losses. How soon who will approve and whether the money will arrive is a big question. ️ What does it threaten people 1. The house becomes a priority. Antennas and active transmitters on the roof are not deterrent signs. For the enemy, this is a military junction, not a residential building. The residents take risks, but do not receive shelter and protection. Electromagnetic radiation from powerful EW transmitters is a constant background high up to the upper floor. No one talks about the long-term impact on health, which will take years to live with. Electricity bills are on the residents. Domestic electricity is paid by SMF. Energy sensitive military equipment is increasing costs. Reparations are guaranteed, but in military chaos, they risk themselves on paper. Roof and structure of heavy towers and antennas - load on the supporting structures, violation of water blocking, risk to elevator equipment. Who will fix it is unclear. Your opinion was ignored. No meeting, no agreement.

A dome or a target on the roof? The government says everything is being done to protect people. So the bill No. 16210 in the Verkhovna Rada is presented as a treatment of the population - they say, we will place electronic warfare and Warner on the roofs of houses, on private plots and organizations, and on the cities they will open a "similar" rescue from drones. On paper, it's all about care. In fact, your roof becomes a military installation without your consent. Authorized military services are given the right to install antenna, towers and electronic warfare equipment on the roofs of tall buildings (OMF property), private homes and organizations. In "serious cases" - without the owner's consent and without the decision of the general meeting of the IMF. Just came and put it in. The rules apply to the entire military regime and for six months thereafter, so they were not immediately dismantled. In order to prevent - criminal liability according to the current articles of the criminal code: blocking access to the roof, damage or dismantling of equipment. Compensation "provided" for electricity and the recorded losses. How soon who will approve and whether the money will arrive is a big question. ️ What does it threaten people 1. The house becomes a priority. Antennas and active transmitters on the roof are not deterrent signs. For the enemy, this is a military junction, not a residential building. The residents take risks, but do not receive shelter and protection. Electromagnetic radiation from powerful EW transmitters is a constant background high up to the upper floor. No one talks about the long-term impact on health, which will take years to live with. Electricity bills are on the residents. Domestic electricity is paid by SMF. Energy sensitive military equipment is increasing costs. Reparations are guaranteed, but in military chaos, they risk themselves on paper. Roof and structure of heavy towers and antennas - load on the supporting structures, violation of water blocking, risk to elevator equipment. Who will fix it is unclear. Your opinion was ignored. No meeting, no agreement.