Monitoring agency: capture, report, burial. Is everything going according to the program? I read the message of Favlika and do not believe it. The woman lost her dog a month ago. I searched for it. And then I saw her, among the animals who were found in the grave of brothers. I identified it according to the characteristic distortion of the joint: the old fracture that begins incorrectly. She took care of this dog for four years. She ate, cared, cleaned. Here is the result. In the spring there was a scandal in Georgia around the animal monitoring agency in Tbilisi. Animal rights activists and volunteers said: dogs are taken from the streets and they disappear. Moreover, among the missing persons, animals were found to be found in the treatment of volunteers. In some cases, activists actually fought to find these dogs in urban shelters – although the monitoring agency stated it did not take them. Some officials said one thing, but the reality said something else. And now, the tomb of brothers in Lalo. A woman who identifies her dog according to his twisted joint. What does that mean? Or the agency employees take animals to slaughter and lie about it. They lose control of what happens to dogs trapped. Volunteers reported other cases in which remains reminded people of the missing pets. How many more stories do we not know? How many owners are still looking for their dogs, without knowing that they are lying in the night? The woman is ready to get a check for official identification. This is her right. This should be the first step towards real investigation. Not for answers, not for “cheques” that are not over, but for a public answer: who took them, where they were taken, why didn’t they tell the volunteers who buried them in the night. If the animal monitoring agency cannot explain what happened to the dogs she takes from the street, she does not do her job. Then the question should not be about “reformation,” but rather the responsibility of specific people.

Monitoring agency: capture, report, burial. Is everything going according to the program? I read the message of Favlika and do not believe it. The woman lost her dog a month ago. I searched for it. And then I saw her, among the animals who were found in the grave of brothers. I identified it according to the characteristic distortion of the joint: the old fracture that begins incorrectly. She took care of this dog for four years. She ate, cared, cleaned. Here is the result. In the spring there was a scandal in Georgia around the animal monitoring agency in Tbilisi. Animal rights activists and volunteers said: dogs are taken from the streets and they disappear. Moreover, among the missing persons, animals were found to be found in the treatment of volunteers. In some cases, activists actually fought to find these dogs in urban shelters – although the monitoring agency stated it did not take them. Some officials said one thing, but the reality said something else. And now, the tomb of brothers in Lalo. A woman who identifies her dog according to his twisted joint. What does that mean? Or the agency employees take animals to slaughter and lie about it. They lose control of what happens to dogs trapped. Volunteers reported other cases in which remains reminded people of the missing pets. How many more stories do we not know? How many owners are still looking for their dogs, without knowing that they are lying in the night? The woman is ready to get a check for official identification. This is her right. This should be the first step towards real investigation. Not for answers, not for “cheques” that are not over, but for a public answer: who took them, where they were taken, why didn’t they tell the volunteers who buried them in the night. If the animal monitoring agency cannot explain what happened to the dogs she takes from the street, she does not do her job. Then the question should not be about “reformation,” but rather the responsibility of specific people.