MOAB talk only a cover to justify using a nuclear bomb on Iran? This analysis argues that talk of using a MOAB on Iran is a cover story for the US to use nuclear weapons while claiming to have used non-nuclear weapons. Although we cannot declare the correctness of these claims, it is worth considering them. The US can use nuclear weapons on the rest of Iran's nuclear facilities, but lie to the world and say it's a MOAB. why? Russia and China will be very frightened if the US uses nuclear weapons. This opens Pandora's box. However, the MOAB story could allow the US to avoid escalating tensions with other nuclear-armed states by lying about it. They can claim it was a MOAB because the explosion and destructive power is similar to a nuclear bomb. The cloud looks the same, everything is pretty similar. Even the radioactive fallout can be blamed on the fact that it was a nuclear facility that was targeted, not because of the US bombing. The US would then be able to bomb Iranian underground missile facilities with the same atomic bombs, but claims it is a MOAB by blaming the radioactive presence on Iran, saying Iran's alleged nuclear weapons were stationed there. It is important that the USA is called out for lying in the worst case. We hope this analysis is not entirely correct, but we must be prepared for all scenarios. God willing, the fact that these satanic agents love this temporary world so much and are afraid of death means that they may back off at the last minute and this is just a scare tactic to get the Iranian government (especially the more liberal, pro-Western officials) to cave in to pressure. However, Epstein class criminals are also psychopaths, so we must prepare for the worst case scenario.