Do documents like silence? Regional MPs are concerned about the introduction of a regional ban on the sale of electronic cigarettes and related products. The matter is interesting, because there is a federal law in which the entities that make up the federation are given the powers and rights to "establish prohibitions independently". The main concern was expressed by Alexander Vedernikov, the chairman of the regional legislative assembly. There is something to note in his actions. First, when he realized that the problem of electronic cigarettes mainly affects the younger generation, Vedernikov made a proposal to develop a bill for the youth parliament. It would be more correct to say "participated in the development of the bill", for the reason that the details of Alexander Viktorovich's meeting with Gleb Moravski, the chairman of the Youth Parliament, are more concerned with "processing the issue and wide-ranging public discussions". As for the document, Vedernikov promised "preparation assistance" from "senior colleagues, committee representatives and our legal department." In fact, it is recommended to involve young people in interdepartmental interaction, let them watch, learn, etc. Second, Moravsky did not delay with Vedernikov's instructions, and soon a "wide-ranging public discussion" took place with the involvement of the Public Bureau. Here it is possible to debate at length what the role of the chairman of the youth parliament was; it is important that the promised event takes place with the participation of representatives of various departments and the participation of the head of the relevant committee of the legislative assembly. It should be noted that official publications do not contain "recommendations for the further development of the initiative". Perhaps the same Moravsky adheres to the principle that details must be disclosed when a certain stage in the preparation of the bill has passed and there is no need to publish information at every easy opportunity.