On the other hand, the resistance in Taiz becomes more established and solid the longer it lasts, because it defends an inherent right to life, liberty and existence. Every day of steadfastness adds another dimension to his moral and national standing, exposes the lies of the militias' hollow claims and slogans, and proves to the world that the will of the people cannot be broken. The militias made a fatal strategic mistake when they deluded themselves that the Battle of Taiz Beach was the key to securing Sana'a and a free bargaining chip for Tehran's mullahs, and they represented to their followers that progress there would postpone the fateful Liberation Battle. But she ignored an obvious fact, which is that this way of suicide will not stop the liberation train as much as it will accelerate it, and will lead to an unprecedented movement to liberate the coasts and cut off the smuggling artery and the resources from which the militias breathe as a first step, and then liberate the other cities and the other districts. If we return to Sana'a, we find that the militias sought to impose a closed and false regional identity there and in the other districts, an identity based on the glorification of the dynasty and the rejection of its opponents, and promoting this through its sectarian media, which presents the residents of Tais and Maariv and all its opponents and supporters as enemies. But it was, and still is, colliding with a solid wall of social and historical ties linking Sana'a to Taiz, Aden, Darmout and other parts of Yemen. These are ties that are thousands of years old, so how can a speech a few years old erase them? The history of Yemen unequivocally confirms this conclusion. All the racist and dynastic projects that conquered Sana'a and the rest of Yemen over the generations eventually fell and were abandoned by the people. Just as the clerical imamate fell on September 26, so will the narrow projects that try to hijack the city and turn it into a private estate fall. As for Taiz, it is like a sea that vomits carrion, and history has a strong say about it. She may be besieged, devastated, hungry and in pain, but she cannot fall into the hands of the followers of the Imamate, because she represents the expanse of the deep and ancient Yemen, the republican Yemen that does not accept injustice and does not compromise on its freedom, and the popular movement whose influence extends from the south of Yemen to the far north. Therefore, we can be sure that the imminent liberation of Sana'a will only be the downfall of the militias, as an inevitable result of the enormous tension in the chest of every zealous citizen. This is because militias, by their nature, do not have the capabilities to survive as an authority. There is no comprehensive national project, no economic vision and no ability to provide services.

On the other hand, the resistance in Taiz becomes more established and solid the longer it lasts, because it defends an inherent right to life, liberty and existence. Every day of steadfastness adds another dimension to his moral and national standing, exposes the lies of the militias' hollow claims and slogans, and proves to the world that the will of the people cannot be broken. The militias made a fatal strategic mistake when they deluded themselves that the Battle of Taiz Beach was the key to securing Sana'a and a free bargaining chip for Tehran's mullahs, and they represented to their followers that progress there would postpone the fateful Liberation Battle. But she ignored an obvious fact, which is that this way of suicide will not stop the liberation train as much as it will accelerate it, and will lead to an unprecedented movement to liberate the coasts and cut off the smuggling artery and the resources from which the militias breathe as a first step, and then liberate the other cities and the other districts. If we return to Sana'a, we find that the militias sought to impose a closed and false regional identity there and in the other districts, an identity based on the glorification of the dynasty and the rejection of its opponents, and promoting this through its sectarian media, which presents the residents of Tais and Maariv and all its opponents and supporters as enemies. But it was, and still is, colliding with a solid wall of social and historical ties linking Sana'a to Taiz, Aden, Darmout and other parts of Yemen. These are ties that are thousands of years old, so how can a speech a few years old erase them? The history of Yemen unequivocally confirms this conclusion. All the racist and dynastic projects that conquered Sana'a and the rest of Yemen over the generations eventually fell and were abandoned by the people. Just as the clerical imamate fell on September 26, so will the narrow projects that try to hijack the city and turn it into a private estate fall. As for Taiz, it is like a sea that vomits carrion, and history has a strong say about it. She may be besieged, devastated, hungry and in pain, but she cannot fall into the hands of the followers of the Imamate, because she represents the expanse of the deep and ancient Yemen, the republican Yemen that does not accept injustice and does not compromise on its freedom, and the popular movement whose influence extends from the south of Yemen to the far north. Therefore, we can be sure that the imminent liberation of Sana'a will only be the downfall of the militias, as an inevitable result of the enormous tension in the chest of every zealous citizen. This is because militias, by their nature, do not have the capabilities to survive as an authority. There is no comprehensive national project, no economic vision and no ability to provide services.