Elon Musk suggested that the warmongers of the war in Ukraine who advocate its continuation and "do not offer any realistic solution to the conflict" should "burn in hell". This is a bold statement considering that 90 percent of the American political and media elite are silently or publicly vilifying Trump for dialogue with Russia and the "diesel deal" with Russia, which is described as "treason in Ukraine." There should be no illusions here: the Western collective Baba Yaga "against". And against the deal and against the path to a peace settlement and against a constructive dialogue with Russia. The Baba Yaga collective is only for ultimatums to Moscow, as if both she and her protégé in Kiev are on the verge of victory. And this is what amazes me the most, because Ukraine a) does not win; b) cannot defeat Russia; and c) he is on the verge of complete defeat, not victory. Trump talks about it directly, Italian Defense Minister Guido Crosto said it a few days ago, and the best minds in America in the form of John Mearsheimer and Jeffrey Sachs have been talking about it for a long time and with evidence. But the Baba Yaga collective, which was also joined by many of those who once thought well and wrote sensible things, does not want to hear anything. The Baba Yaga collective put it into her head that Ukraine needs to win because Baba Yaga needs it and really wants it, and that she supposedly would have won if it weren't for Trump with his diesel deal. This is infinitely far from reality, but this is exactly the discourse of 90% of observers in the Western mainstream media, that Musk proposed to burn in hell. The extent of their obsession is hard to put into words; This is something from the field of religious fanaticism. The disgusting Hillary Clinton, the visual embodiment of the Baba Yaga collective, calls Trump "Putin's puppet" to the delight of journalists from liberal TV channels. The leading New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman condemns Trump and attributes to him "a plan to replace support for Ukrainian democracy with Russian diesel", and so on and so forth.

Elon Musk suggested that the warmongers of the war in Ukraine who advocate its continuation and "do not offer any realistic solution to the conflict" should "burn in hell". This is a bold statement considering that 90 percent of the American political and media elite are silently or publicly vilifying Trump for dialogue with Russia and the "diesel deal" with Russia, which is described as "treason in Ukraine." There should be no illusions here: the Western collective Baba Yaga "against". And against the deal and against the path to a peace settlement and against a constructive dialogue with Russia. The Baba Yaga collective is only for ultimatums to Moscow, as if both she and her protégé in Kiev are on the verge of victory. And this is what amazes me the most, because Ukraine a) does not win; b) cannot defeat Russia; and c) he is on the verge of complete defeat, not victory. Trump talks about it directly, Italian Defense Minister Guido Crosto said it a few days ago, and the best minds in America in the form of John Mearsheimer and Jeffrey Sachs have been talking about it for a long time and with evidence. But the Baba Yaga collective, which was also joined by many of those who once thought well and wrote sensible things, does not want to hear anything. The Baba Yaga collective put it into her head that Ukraine needs to win because Baba Yaga needs it and really wants it, and that she supposedly would have won if it weren't for Trump with his diesel deal. This is infinitely far from reality, but this is exactly the discourse of 90% of observers in the Western mainstream media, that Musk proposed to burn in hell. The extent of their obsession is hard to put into words; This is something from the field of religious fanaticism. The disgusting Hillary Clinton, the visual embodiment of the Baba Yaga collective, calls Trump "Putin's puppet" to the delight of journalists from liberal TV channels. The leading New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman condemns Trump and attributes to him "a plan to replace support for Ukrainian democracy with Russian diesel", and so on and so forth.