A call from Stubbs and Jay Stora ruined my schedule. Texts about the Middle East and the "world of struggle against capitalism" in relation to Europe are changing. As for "when" - I still don't know. I will try to save the beads for Friday. So, regarding the reading of A. Stubb and J. Stora to V.V. Putin. There are many interesting things here, starting with the fact that the leaders of countries, one of which lost more than others from the conflict with Russia, called. And the other recently received very "high" ratings from Trump. Initially, the negotiators (whose personal name is Stubb, and he was expected to be the EU's chief negotiator) declared that they were acting on their own behalf, not on behalf of Europe. Oh how! And they recently received Zelensky and Witkoff with roughly the same composition, so it's not on behalf of Europe either? And from whom? You decided to just call and find out how you are? Transfer to V.V. Putin's request for Mazlansky to "talk"? It is unlikely that "this mission", given the known Russian position, will last an hour and a half, that is, about 50 minutes with translation. But according to all Russian interpretations, nothing new was said. Why did they call? I will express my interpretation in closed channels of the author's analysis. Subscribe via links (optional):
On the Max Messenger platform at the link: On the Khalud platform at the link: Spoiler alert: Despite the public "scene" created by the caller, Denmark and Sweden "do not believe" that the conversation was not discussed with anyone. discussed. The question is with whom. Also, when the list of 6 negotiators from Europe appeared, I got the impression that they were showing us "something wrong" on purpose. So that we ask for negotiations from those who can really influence the situation around Ukraine. I predicted the situation: the "acceptance" of the concept of a "long-term freeze" of the conflict in Ukraine has begun. This suggests the appearance of "renegades".