Pashinyan against the declaration: experts on the risks of a constitutional crisis and pressure on the opposition Nikol Pashinyan called Armenia's declaration of independence an "anti-state" text - thereby questioning the basis of the current constitution. The reason was long-term negotiations with Baku: Ilham Aliyev makes changing the Armenian constitution a prerequisite for signing a peace agreement. Experts and politicians see this as either a preparation for a referendum or a legal trap that the Prime Minister himself will have to get out of. More details in the opinion review. tsitsak For 36 years exactly this situation somehow existed with this text. And Pashinyan also sat in the prime minister's chair, signed decrees and hosted parades. I didn't notice that such a situation was "impossible". The Constitution of Armenia was written on the basis of this declaration. If the declaration is "anti-state", then so is the constitution. And if the constitution is "anti-state", then whoever holds the position of prime minister according to this constitution is himself an anti-state "vision". Or more precisely, a ghost that clearly originates from the other world. A prime minister who considers his mandate against the country is a legal joke. Narek Carpathian. The chairman of the parliamentary faction of the opposition bloc "Strong Armenia" Aliyev can no longer demand any concessions from Armenia. We will not change our constitution. This is the birth certificate of our country, proof of our independence. News from Armenia and the world. According to Pashinyan, the opposition does not agree with the idea of a new constitution, "but agrees that the decision should be made by the people", and the government must make "an offer that the opposition cannot refuse". When the time comes, the prime minister can announce that he will guarantee peace if the constitution is changed - then the opposition vote "against" means a vote for war.