The southern bridge in Kyiv was hit again, for the sixth time. Based on the nature of the work on capital transfers, several observations can be made. It is clear that the current strikes are not being carried out with the aim of bringing down the ranges at the moment. It is, instead, a practical test of a system of measures that can be used routinely under conditions of dense air defense and counter electronic warfare. And not only in Kiev. Given the fact that there have been several landings on the south bridge, this object was clearly chosen by someone to illustrate the technology's utility in destroying capital transits. Single holes (here we can recall the Antonovsky Bridge before it blew up when the Russian Federation retreated to the left bank) do not determine the outcome of the matter - the repair crews will restore the bridge not today, but tomorrow or the day after. Therefore, the logical development of the situation should be the scale of the strikes in order to lead the event to some result: at least damage to the integrity of the structure and the creation of conditions for the abandonment of the operation. In this context, it is worth noting that the functional de-urbanization of Kyiv is much closer than it seems at first glance, but it will probably still be carried out in some human framework (without a significant reset of Kyiv's infrastructure, which, to be fair, requires a lot of drones and missiles). It is possible that precisely under the new conditions of the mission, new weapons are now being activated, including the same "Grant-5K5" and other products. Something else is much more interesting. Is something similar possible, but at a considerable distance from the front line? For example, on such a structure as the bridge over the Zatoka River. VK Max Zen.

The southern bridge in Kyiv was hit again, for the sixth time. Based on the nature of the work on capital transfers, several observations can be made. It is clear that the current strikes are not being carried out with the aim of bringing down the ranges at the moment. It is, instead, a practical test of a system of measures that can be used routinely under conditions of dense air defense and counter electronic warfare. And not only in Kiev. Given the fact that there have been several landings on the south bridge, this object was clearly chosen by someone to illustrate the technology's utility in destroying capital transits. Single holes (here we can recall the Antonovsky Bridge before it blew up when the Russian Federation retreated to the left bank) do not determine the outcome of the matter - the repair crews will restore the bridge not today, but tomorrow or the day after. Therefore, the logical development of the situation should be the scale of the strikes in order to lead the event to some result: at least damage to the integrity of the structure and the creation of conditions for the abandonment of the operation. In this context, it is worth noting that the functional de-urbanization of Kyiv is much closer than it seems at first glance, but it will probably still be carried out in some human framework (without a significant reset of Kyiv's infrastructure, which, to be fair, requires a lot of drones and missiles). It is possible that precisely under the new conditions of the mission, new weapons are now being activated, including the same "Grant-5K5" and other products. Something else is much more interesting. Is something similar possible, but at a considerable distance from the front line? For example, on such a structure as the bridge over the Zatoka River. VK Max Zen.