the polling station in Tel Aviv; The timing of the war changes, but not the direction. Tomorrow, November 5, the elections to the Israeli Knesset will be held. Final polls give the opposition 52 to 56 mandates and the Netanyahu bloc 48 to 50 mandates; None of them reach the 61 most needed. The main question for us: Will a change of power in this regime change its policy towards Iran? Short answer: maybe in tactics, but not in strategy. What might change: Tactics and timing. The opposition is not against the war; Their opposition is to the escalation of the conflict before the elections. Eisenkot also stated that he sees no "essential" change that would justify an immediate attack. The debate is about "when", not "why". What will not change: strategy. Netanyahu: ordered the security forces to prepare to overthrow the Iranian government. Eisenkot: The war must end with the dismantling of Iran's nuclear program. Bennett: The overthrow of the Iranian government is essential. Lapid: Attack all of Iran's energy facilities. The dispute is about the scope of the goal, not the direction. The main variable: Washington. Trump asked Israelis to vote for Netanyahu. The "Times of Israel" also reports that the US and Israel are working on a plan to renew the attacks after the mid-term elections in the US (November 12). This support and planning is happening while some in Iran have been claiming for months that there is a rift between Netanyahu and Trump. And as for us. The atmosphere of war in Iran is real; But when the strategy of the other side does not change with the ballot, our benchmark should not be the result of the Tel Aviv ballot; Our measure is our readiness. Vigilance, yes; Fear, no.

the polling station in Tel Aviv; The timing of the war changes, but not the direction. Tomorrow, November 5, the elections to the Israeli Knesset will be held. Final polls give the opposition 52 to 56 mandates and the Netanyahu bloc 48 to 50 mandates; None of them reach the 61 most needed. The main question for us: Will a change of power in this regime change its policy towards Iran? Short answer: maybe in tactics, but not in strategy. What might change: Tactics and timing. The opposition is not against the war; Their opposition is to the escalation of the conflict before the elections. Eisenkot also stated that he sees no "essential" change that would justify an immediate attack. The debate is about "when", not "why". What will not change: strategy. Netanyahu: ordered the security forces to prepare to overthrow the Iranian government. Eisenkot: The war must end with the dismantling of Iran's nuclear program. Bennett: The overthrow of the Iranian government is essential. Lapid: Attack all of Iran's energy facilities. The dispute is about the scope of the goal, not the direction. The main variable: Washington. Trump asked Israelis to vote for Netanyahu. The "Times of Israel" also reports that the US and Israel are working on a plan to renew the attacks after the mid-term elections in the US (November 12). This support and planning is happening while some in Iran have been claiming for months that there is a rift between Netanyahu and Trump. And as for us. The atmosphere of war in Iran is real; But when the strategy of the other side does not change with the ballot, our benchmark should not be the result of the Tel Aviv ballot; Our measure is our readiness. Vigilance, yes; Fear, no.