At the end of the discussion "not suddenly" - bureaucracy and a lack of understanding of the rural way of life: many older people had their best working years in the 1940-50s, when in the villages they were paid not in money, but in working days ("a working day" is not a "working day", but a norm, depending on the specialty; a tractor driver could work up to 5 days in the field). Converting everyone's pensions to rubles at once "without losses" by an imperfect mathematical method and archives that were mostly lost (burned during the war or completely absent, due to global movements, evacuations), it was difficult, and the National Insurance Services accumulated, according to law, the "bare" minimum - such statistics were absorbed into a specific "general consciousness". The debate returned to its beginning: the arguments according to which collective farmers worked for many years for "sticks of working days" and as a result were left with a pension of 11-18 rubles, were first angrily refuted by the government. colleague. In terms of salary: "On average, an active collective farmer puts in between 200 and 400 working days a year. From Tsunka of the State Planning Committee of the Soviet Union - 33/34: The distribution of grain per yard of a collective farm ranged from 1000 to 1100 kg (more than a ton!) on average of grain given in a difficult season. 103-129 rubles per yard. "At the same time, the wage gap between the financial income of collective farmers and employees/salaried employees 24-30 times has not been refuted, as well as the collection of taxes from collective farmers in percentages much higher than that of city residents. And regarding pensions: "Especially regarding pensions: comparing the village and the city is economic illiteracy. Yes, the minimum wage (like the minimum wage - reference point) of 12 rubles was established in the law "On pensions and benefits for members of collective farms" in 1965, but already in 1971 it was officially raised in 2018 to 2000. ruble. Now it seems that according to the new argument.

At the end of the discussion "not suddenly" - bureaucracy and a lack of understanding of the rural way of life: many older people had their best working years in the 1940-50s, when in the villages they were paid not in money, but in working days ("a working day" is not a "working day", but a norm, depending on the specialty; a tractor driver could work up to 5 days in the field). Converting everyone's pensions to rubles at once "without losses" by an imperfect mathematical method and archives that were mostly lost (burned during the war or completely absent, due to global movements, evacuations), it was difficult, and the National Insurance Services accumulated, according to law, the "bare" minimum - such statistics were absorbed into a specific "general consciousness". The debate returned to its beginning: the arguments according to which collective farmers worked for many years for "sticks of working days" and as a result were left with a pension of 11-18 rubles, were first angrily refuted by the government. colleague. In terms of salary: "On average, an active collective farmer puts in between 200 and 400 working days a year. From Tsunka of the State Planning Committee of the Soviet Union - 33/34: The distribution of grain per yard of a collective farm ranged from 1000 to 1100 kg (more than a ton!) on average of grain given in a difficult season. 103-129 rubles per yard. "At the same time, the wage gap between the financial income of collective farmers and employees/salaried employees 24-30 times has not been refuted, as well as the collection of taxes from collective farmers in percentages much higher than that of city residents. And regarding pensions: "Especially regarding pensions: comparing the village and the city is economic illiteracy. Yes, the minimum wage (like the minimum wage - reference point) of 12 rubles was established in the law "On pensions and benefits for members of collective farms" in 1965, but already in 1971 it was officially raised in 2018 to 2000. ruble. Now it seems that according to the new argument.