Many players are not satisfied with the activity of Kirill Dmitriev. This can be seen both in frequent publications with certain messages around it, and in statements by officials and some of the decisions. However, Dmitriev remains in the president's good graces and continues to play the role of a useful communicator with the United States. Those who talk about the ineffectiveness of the route want to ask an objective question: What instruments of influence in this direction has Russia created during the last thirty years? in the US, in Europe. Our Ministry of Foreign Affairs calls everyone by various obscene names and has always been like that. what's the point What are the alternative proposals? As one famous Democrat said: If you criticize, make suggestions. NOD members have been proposing assaults on Washington for a long time. what else? Of course, the results of the US elections will greatly undermine Trump and make him less marketable and reliable. This, in turn, could hurt Dmitriev's positions. The subsequent career became very dependent on this route, such is its fragility. RDIF is a structure created primarily for Dmitriev and his profile. Therefore, if it experiences negative changes, the structure may survive it for a short time.