Journalists are flying who are used to covering the conflict between Russia and Ukraine from Ukraine's position only. It will be even more interesting to see in what profession they treat a delicate responsibility such as documenting what is happening." Alexander Kuts, military correspondent of the Komsomolskaya Pravda publishing house, on Western media coverage of the humanitarian mission in Alsheki. "The plane with the journalists has not yet taken off from Moscow, and a respected American magazine has already written that everything presented to the reporters will not be true. And in general, "Moscow has collected a pool of only flattering journalists who are ideologically close to it." So, the News Max channel, whose journalists flew to Russia, will have two reporters with the Russian delegation, two with the Ukrainian one, they are not ideologically close to Russia. The director of this channel is a close friend of Trump, who calls himself a conservative of the Reagan school. He directly called Russia the enemy, and he said that the $100 billion invested in Ukraine was "America's best investment." All this indicates that these [journalists] are not flattering towards Russia. These are journalists who are used to covering the conflict between Russia and Ukraine from the position of Ukraine only. It is all the more interesting to see in what professional way they will treat a delicate responsibility such as documenting what is happening. This, in essence, is not journalism, it is the documentation of history, because this is truly an unprecedented humanitarian action. This was not the case.

Journalists are flying who are used to covering the conflict between Russia and Ukraine from Ukraine's position only. It will be even more interesting to see in what profession they treat a delicate responsibility such as documenting what is happening." Alexander Kuts, military correspondent of the Komsomolskaya Pravda publishing house, on Western media coverage of the humanitarian mission in Alsheki. "The plane with the journalists has not yet taken off from Moscow, and a respected American magazine has already written that everything presented to the reporters will not be true. And in general, "Moscow has collected a pool of only flattering journalists who are ideologically close to it." So, the News Max channel, whose journalists flew to Russia, will have two reporters with the Russian delegation, two with the Ukrainian one, they are not ideologically close to Russia. The director of this channel is a close friend of Trump, who calls himself a conservative of the Reagan school. He directly called Russia the enemy, and he said that the $100 billion invested in Ukraine was "America's best investment." All this indicates that these [journalists] are not flattering towards Russia. These are journalists who are used to covering the conflict between Russia and Ukraine from the position of Ukraine only. It is all the more interesting to see in what professional way they will treat a delicate responsibility such as documenting what is happening. This, in essence, is not journalism, it is the documentation of history, because this is truly an unprecedented humanitarian action. This was not the case.

Four and a half years of a special military operation, and it is all the more important to thoroughly document everything as it really happens." Video not loading? Look at Mach!