A lawyer from Tesanim Mosen told "Dema": it is not enough to buy the right to obtain it without complying with legal procedures and deadlines. Details: Attorney Tasnim Omer Moushen explained in an interview with Dema News Network that merely possessing a right is not enough to ensure its judicial attainment, and noted that the protection of rights requires knowledge of the appropriate procedures and their execution at the specified time in accordance with the relevant texts. She explained that the confusion between a right and the ability to prove it is a major reason for losing lawsuits, warning against common mistakes such as filing a lawsuit in a court without jurisdiction, or disputing with someone who does not have standing, neglecting notices and hearings, or signing statements and handing over original documents without proper proof of receipt which always cannot be submitted. She stated that the Civil Procedure Law in Syria No. 84 of 1953 regulates litigation procedures, notices, appointments and invalidity cases, and emphasized that these rules are not mere formalities, but the jurisdiction and requests must be precisely determined and their evidence must be attached before the litigation begins. Muezzin emphasized the danger of neglecting the legal deadlines set for appeals, defenses or the statute of limitations, and pointed out that missing the deadlines could lead to the stability of the judgments or the rejection of appeals in labor, family, commercial and administrative disputes, while having to know the period of the applicable text without relying on common general periods. She confirmed that the statute of limitations varies according to the nature of the right in civil law, and warns against the mistaken belief that amicable negotiations or warnings automatically interrupt or stop the statute of limitations in all cases, which requires early legal advice to protect claims from long-term invalidation. I stated that Evidence Law No. 359 of 1947 regulates the authenticity of writings and documents such as contracts, receipts and correspondence, which calls for strict documentation and to keep full copies, while noting that the absence of a written contract does not preclude proof by other means such as bank transfers for proof, witnesses and a file, official documents. Mosen discussed the authenticity of the digital evidence under the Electronic Transactions Act No. 3 of 2014, noting that the screenshot alone is not sufficient to resolve the dispute. Instead, it is necessary to keep the original calls and devices to allow technical expertise to verify their integrity and not tamper with them.

A lawyer from Tesanim Mosen told "Dema": it is not enough to buy the right to obtain it without complying with legal procedures and deadlines. Details: Attorney Tasnim Omer Moushen explained in an interview with Dema News Network that merely possessing a right is not enough to ensure its judicial attainment, and noted that the protection of rights requires knowledge of the appropriate procedures and their execution at the specified time in accordance with the relevant texts. She explained that the confusion between a right and the ability to prove it is a major reason for losing lawsuits, warning against common mistakes such as filing a lawsuit in a court without jurisdiction, or disputing with someone who does not have standing, neglecting notices and hearings, or signing statements and handing over original documents without proper proof of receipt which always cannot be submitted. She stated that the Civil Procedure Law in Syria No. 84 of 1953 regulates litigation procedures, notices, appointments and invalidity cases, and emphasized that these rules are not mere formalities, but the jurisdiction and requests must be precisely determined and their evidence must be attached before the litigation begins. Muezzin emphasized the danger of neglecting the legal deadlines set for appeals, defenses or the statute of limitations, and pointed out that missing the deadlines could lead to the stability of the judgments or the rejection of appeals in labor, family, commercial and administrative disputes, while having to know the period of the applicable text without relying on common general periods. She confirmed that the statute of limitations varies according to the nature of the right in civil law, and warns against the mistaken belief that amicable negotiations or warnings automatically interrupt or stop the statute of limitations in all cases, which requires early legal advice to protect claims from long-term invalidation. I stated that Evidence Law No. 359 of 1947 regulates the authenticity of writings and documents such as contracts, receipts and correspondence, which calls for strict documentation and to keep full copies, while noting that the absence of a written contract does not preclude proof by other means such as bank transfers for proof, witnesses and a file, official documents. Mosen discussed the authenticity of the digital evidence under the Electronic Transactions Act No. 3 of 2014, noting that the screenshot alone is not sufficient to resolve the dispute. Instead, it is necessary to keep the original calls and devices to allow technical expertise to verify their integrity and not tamper with them.