Lawyer Muhammad Mu'atez al-Ali told "Sham": An appeal against the waiver depends on the legal conditions of coercion, and the evaluation of the evidence is up to the judiciary. Details: In an interview with the "Sham News" network, lawyer Muhammad Mo'etaz al-Ali explained that the possibility of appealing the waiver depends on the nature of the act and the circumstances in which it ended, and the extent of the availability of legal conditions for coercion, and emphasized that the assessment of these issues is up to the judiciary based on the evidence presented. Al-Ali explained the difference between lack of consent and defects in will, and explained that consent is an essential layer in contracts; Its absence is achieved by the complete absence of will, such as signing while unconscious, under anesthesia, or physical coercion by force, which makes the act without its foundations, while the defects of consent to the fulfillment of the will are achieved when it is affected by factors such as psychological coercion, a mistake that makes the deception, or exploitation, subject to deception, or exploitation, a judicial ruling is given. He noted that Section 128 of the Syrian Civil Law deals with coercion related to inciting fear that leads to the termination of the action, and noted that the mere feeling of shame or family embarrassment is not sufficient in itself for cancellation, while the matter is different when they are exposed to serious threats that affect the freedom of decision, such as injury, slander, slander, the judicial authority's discretion due to the severity of the threat and its circumstances. Al-Ali reviewed the means of proving coercion before the court, which include testimony from relatives and neighbors who witnessed the threats, text messages and electronic messages that include threats or blackmail, audio recordings that meet the conditions of legal admissibility, and medical or psychological reports, emphasizing the need to gather evidence to determine the court's jurisdiction. He touched on the privacy of renouncing inheritance and real estate, and pointed out that the procedures become more complex when documenting the disposition in the Land Registry, since the effect of the registration does not disappear automatically with proof of coercion, but requires a special judicial procedure to implement the judgment according to the nature of the transaction and its official documentation. He elaborated on the issue of waiving the criminal complaint, emphasizing the need to distinguish between civil and financial rights, since the criminal waiver may result in the dismissal of the public prosecution in crimes conditioned on the victim's complaint, while the possibility of its cancellation is subject to the nature of the offense and does not exist at any stage of the procedure.

Lawyer Muhammad Mu'atez al-Ali told "Sham": An appeal against the waiver depends on the legal conditions of coercion, and the evaluation of the evidence is up to the judiciary. Details: In an interview with the "Sham News" network, lawyer Muhammad Mo'etaz al-Ali explained that the possibility of appealing the waiver depends on the nature of the act and the circumstances in which it ended, and the extent of the availability of legal conditions for coercion, and emphasized that the assessment of these issues is up to the judiciary based on the evidence presented. Al-Ali explained the difference between lack of consent and defects in will, and explained that consent is an essential layer in contracts; Its absence is achieved by the complete absence of will, such as signing while unconscious, under anesthesia, or physical coercion by force, which makes the act without its foundations, while the defects of consent to the fulfillment of the will are achieved when it is affected by factors such as psychological coercion, a mistake that makes the deception, or exploitation, subject to deception, or exploitation, a judicial ruling is given. He noted that Section 128 of the Syrian Civil Law deals with coercion related to inciting fear that leads to the termination of the action, and noted that the mere feeling of shame or family embarrassment is not sufficient in itself for cancellation, while the matter is different when they are exposed to serious threats that affect the freedom of decision, such as injury, slander, slander, the judicial authority's discretion due to the severity of the threat and its circumstances. Al-Ali reviewed the means of proving coercion before the court, which include testimony from relatives and neighbors who witnessed the threats, text messages and electronic messages that include threats or blackmail, audio recordings that meet the conditions of legal admissibility, and medical or psychological reports, emphasizing the need to gather evidence to determine the court's jurisdiction. He touched on the privacy of renouncing inheritance and real estate, and pointed out that the procedures become more complex when documenting the disposition in the Land Registry, since the effect of the registration does not disappear automatically with proof of coercion, but requires a special judicial procedure to implement the judgment according to the nature of the transaction and its official documentation. He elaborated on the issue of waiving the criminal complaint, emphasizing the need to distinguish between civil and financial rights, since the criminal waiver may result in the dismissal of the public prosecution in crimes conditioned on the victim's complaint, while the possibility of its cancellation is subject to the nature of the offense and does not exist at any stage of the procedure.