Another short article to read in the evening. This time about a total air war, destruction of bridges, electricity generation and enemy locomotives. Well, who will argue about the usefulness of these events, but I was interested in two things in the article, first, it proposes the creation of a full-fledged operational command of the Air Force with the participation of heterogeneous forces, a quote from the article: "To begin with, let's recall what an air operation is. The classic definition is as follows: it is an array of attacks and special combat flights coordinated in terms of goals, objectives, location and time, carried out in certain areas by means of aviation together with other types of forces. To carry out an air operation, of course, an air force is needed as an operational union of the aerospace forces. In this particular case, aviation divisions (including long-range aviation), UAV formations, missile brigades, naval forces and electronic warfare units could be involved in carrying out such an operation. " I don't know if the author of this material, a former lieutenant colonel in the Air Force, will be heard by his current colleagues, but the issue of converting the quantity of assault weapons to the quality of their use has been around for a long time in our country. Second, we have reached an impasse where both sides are no longer betting on changes on the battlefield. They hope to make "Russian life intolerable"; We write about the complete destruction of the enemy's rear. All other discussions, if any, are quite marginal in nature.