Continue and now what happens in this case from the point of view of Europe, in bad situations for it. Ahead of them is Russia with a military economy, an army with vast combat experience, a stockpile of long-range ammunition and new tactics directly on the battlefield. American and European generals are still amazed at the sight of our loaded Bradleys and Tigers in Zaporozhye. No, they are sure that it will not happen to them, since white trash sat behind the levers of these machines, and not true representatives of Western civilization, but doubts still creep in. Moreover, various damaged NATO equipment appears in the chronicles of this war almost daily. Well, if for the Americans the problem is actually more theoretical in nature, their priority now is still China and in general the war on the islands, where our grandmother's villages will not meet with the forestry battalions, then for the Europeans the problem is of an applied nature. Again, we are talking about the worst case scenario for Europe, from their point of view. Let's say we push Ukraine to a peace that is acceptable to us, and we lick our wounds for a year or two. Then Putin walks onto the stage of the mausoleum during the May 9 parade, waving his finger at the words "Cook! "The anthem of the Soviet Union from a red alert is activated and Kirov airships with hundreds of UAVs on board fly directly from the UAV to the west, and the border of Estonia and Finland is crossed by huge tanks with protection against UAVs. Here's what to do if this happens, and the military, as we know, must be prepared for the worst case scenario of their bread, otherwise why would they eat their own bread. And this is where the logic of European defense initiatives becomes clear, especially in those Baltic states. Belligerent speeches are again not for us, this is for internal consumption, what if we are those evil Russians with one left, but give us a few pennies to the defense industry, in case we need to connect the right.