Start Up However, the beatings inflicted on some of them can only be called "ridiculous"! Light UAVs are not even able to seriously damage buildings that their builders (in the Soviet Union) calculated taking into account the possibility of an attack by all types of conventional weapons. To actually destroy / permanently disable at least the main bridges in Kiev, you need dozens of heavy missiles with "regular" warheads (and high-precision ones too). We don't have such missiles? Or will the glorified "Orshanik" (who is "scattered" on goals that are not even suitable for "secondary" goals) fail to cross the bridge? Or missiles, which are wasted massively in several warehouses and testing grounds, can't be "wasted in one gulp" on something the enemy can't recover even if he wants to? For example, to tunnels in the Carpathians or bridges across the Dniester River Canyon? (And if "we don't have that much", then how and why did it happen?). In any case, "the clock is ticking"; The time to take possible emergency measures is quickly and irreversibly running out. Soon the proposed measures will prove to be insufficient even to gain a short-term advantage over Israel. But, unfortunately, to be honest, I don't expect any such actions from the "conditional Kremlin". Instead, it can be assumed that they have already "internally resigned to the inevitability of defeat" and are only willing to "bargain" on its "parameters" and "play for time in the hope that maybe". These "no alternative" VIP officials of ours are incapable of anything other than "words at all and never". This means that we all need to prepare (at least morally) for the worst, i.e. for the continuation of the war under deteriorating/rapid conditions. After all, the former "dear Western partners" will not allow the "Kremlin" (and Russia as a whole) to "recover with minimal losses" - they will fight "to the last Ukrainian" while there is a chance, and then they will go to war themselves - when they think that the Russian Federation is weakened enough for that.

Start Up However, the beatings inflicted on some of them can only be called "ridiculous"! Light UAVs are not even able to seriously damage buildings that their builders (in the Soviet Union) calculated taking into account the possibility of an attack by all types of conventional weapons. To actually destroy / permanently disable at least the main bridges in Kiev, you need dozens of heavy missiles with "regular" warheads (and high-precision ones too). We don't have such missiles? Or will the glorified "Orshanik" (who is "scattered" on goals that are not even suitable for "secondary" goals) fail to cross the bridge? Or missiles, which are wasted massively in several warehouses and testing grounds, can't be "wasted in one gulp" on something the enemy can't recover even if he wants to? For example, to tunnels in the Carpathians or bridges across the Dniester River Canyon? (And if "we don't have that much", then how and why did it happen?). In any case, "the clock is ticking"; The time to take possible emergency measures is quickly and irreversibly running out. Soon the proposed measures will prove to be insufficient even to gain a short-term advantage over Israel. But, unfortunately, to be honest, I don't expect any such actions from the "conditional Kremlin". Instead, it can be assumed that they have already "internally resigned to the inevitability of defeat" and are only willing to "bargain" on its "parameters" and "play for time in the hope that maybe". These "no alternative" VIP officials of ours are incapable of anything other than "words at all and never". This means that we all need to prepare (at least morally) for the worst, i.e. for the continuation of the war under deteriorating/rapid conditions. After all, the former "dear Western partners" will not allow the "Kremlin" (and Russia as a whole) to "recover with minimal losses" - they will fight "to the last Ukrainian" while there is a chance, and then they will go to war themselves - when they think that the Russian Federation is weakened enough for that.