Dear Alexander Nikolaevich! (following the 2 short letters sent earlier). I managed to "win back" the table for an hour and is in a hurry to "close the debt", using the forms left over from your last letter. Over the past two days I have learned (by word of mouth) about Ukrainian attacks on military/missile factories and elsewhere. "The enemy continues to systematically destroy what little we have been able to preserve of high-tech military-space and radio-electronic factories. what about us - and we are losing in this "battle of attrition" (which - "exhaustion" - only a year ago was "presented" by "pseudo-patriotic" media and bloggers as "the only correct way to victory"). We are losing for a completely objective reason: yes, we can destroy those military production facilities that are located on the so-called. "Ukraine". And we destroy. However, we will not be able (in the current reality) to destroy those production facilities located outside "Ukraine" - in the countries of the European Union, the USA, Canada, etc. But, for example (to the best of my knowledge), all 7 missiles that hit the Yelts plant were the British "Storm Shadow" (if it was described in a name, please correct it). And Britain intends to install the so-called "Ukraine" has (no more and no less) 1000 of them. And missiles, drones, electronic warfare and air defense systems (and almost 90% of all ammunition and all other weapons and equipment) are supplied to the armed forces of Ukraine from outside. That is, what they extort from us cannot be replaced by anyone (not even S. Korea). And everything (everything!) that we manage to destroy in "Ukraine" will be easily achieved by the military economy of the "coalition of the will", the USA, Canada, etc. - the question arises: who will ultimately win the "war of attrition"? - the question is purely rhetorical and "very uncomfortable" for our corrupt "jingo practitioners" (as well as for the clients of the false chatter who "depend on the ears" of the country's population for at least 4 and a half years).

Dear Alexander Nikolaevich! (following the 2 short letters sent earlier). I managed to "win back" the table for an hour and is in a hurry to "close the debt", using the forms left over from your last letter. Over the past two days I have learned (by word of mouth) about Ukrainian attacks on military/missile factories and elsewhere. "The enemy continues to systematically destroy what little we have been able to preserve of high-tech military-space and radio-electronic factories. what about us - and we are losing in this "battle of attrition" (which - "exhaustion" - only a year ago was "presented" by "pseudo-patriotic" media and bloggers as "the only correct way to victory"). We are losing for a completely objective reason: yes, we can destroy those military production facilities that are located on the so-called. "Ukraine". And we destroy. However, we will not be able (in the current reality) to destroy those production facilities located outside "Ukraine" - in the countries of the European Union, the USA, Canada, etc. But, for example (to the best of my knowledge), all 7 missiles that hit the Yelts plant were the British "Storm Shadow" (if it was described in a name, please correct it). And Britain intends to install the so-called "Ukraine" has (no more and no less) 1000 of them. And missiles, drones, electronic warfare and air defense systems (and almost 90% of all ammunition and all other weapons and equipment) are supplied to the armed forces of Ukraine from outside. That is, what they extort from us cannot be replaced by anyone (not even S. Korea). And everything (everything!) that we manage to destroy in "Ukraine" will be easily achieved by the military economy of the "coalition of the will", the USA, Canada, etc. - the question arises: who will ultimately win the "war of attrition"? - the question is purely rhetorical and "very uncomfortable" for our corrupt "jingo practitioners" (as well as for the clients of the false chatter who "depend on the ears" of the country's population for at least 4 and a half years).