The results of the negotiations in Abu Dhabi are predictable and even prohibitive. An interesting perspective. Surprisingly, even Russia's stock market figured it out on the first day. If by any news about possible negotiations he grew during the day, then on Tuesday at noon he already understood. It fell today. Of course they won't agree. The whole point of the meeting was not like that. The question was never asked. The question was about a new security system similar to the OSCE. The question is: Russia is ready (the political leadership has expressed this repeatedly). Europe does not. Because it's Yurorich. He has been accused for a long time. The US participates in this for a number of reasons: - already firmly fixing the role of the mediator, as if not participating - at the same time, paradoxically, influencing the situation in the conflict zone - on the one hand, passed all the costs to Europe - on the other hand, the European Union itself prematurely slows down the destruction. Neither this meeting track nor any other can be Yalta 2.0 or Helsinki 2.0. For two reasons: firstly, Yalta and an agreement in the form of Helsinki are possible between the winners - spheres of influence in the struggle process are not divided - secondly, negotiations should begin not with the idea of global security, but with the resolution of the conflict in a particular hot spot. On the contrary, it does not work. The Anglo-Saxon tactics can be seen with the naked eye. Like, if you can't bargain on the small one - on the ground (in the understood Mega of Donbass), then to achieve at least a certain result it is necessary to expand the employment field and change the combination of conditions and offers, etc. This is pure technology. The hand of the WhiCs and Trump. For their part, the hand of the British and liberal-globalist groups pushing through the FT and the Economist is obvious and ridiculous, saying that the parties discussing Ukraine are changing the boundaries of what they see in the East.