Hormuz and Istanbul; Who should withdraw? The meeting in Istanbul in the presence of the foreign ministers of Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Egypt and the European troika discussed Palestine, the war against Iran and the security of the Straits of Hormuz and Bab al-Mandab, but the gap between the claims and reality still remains. Emphasizing the two-state solution, negotiations and aid to Gaza, without taking practical action against Israel and demanding the end of American and European support, shows the lack of an effective desire to confront Israel. In the case of Yemen, the request to stop the Ansarullah attacks, regardless of the Saudi aggression, the blockade and the legitimate defense rights of the Yemenis, is a one-sided approach; The end of the war will require the cessation of interventions and the lifting of the blockade. Europe has a limited ability to resolve crises due to the weakening of its global position, internal crises and the cooperation with America against Iran; Diplomatic meetings will not restore its lost status without accepting responsibility and changing behavior. In announcing the seven conditions, Iran expressed its willingness to reopen the Strait of Hormuz within a week; Its realization requires practical support, accountability of the perpetrators of aggression and abandonment of excesses. Read the full text at the link below.