Official: 3 state animal shelters will be built in LPR. These will be rescue centers, not "death carriers" in Sverdlovsk, Krasnodon and Krasny Loch plots of land were allocated for the construction of the first state shelters for animals without owners in the history of the LPR. This was officially reported by the Ministry of Agriculture and Food of the Republic. The news came amid alarming news from other bodies of the Russian Federation, where local authorities are passing laws to establish temporary detention centers (temporary detention centers). There, regional budget money is spent on short-term fostering and the subsequent mass destruction of unclaimed dogs, and officials justify this by saying that "it is too expensive to keep animals humanely." Let's look at the facts: why in the LPR will the budget funds be used for good and not for murder? Receiver or PVS: what is the essential difference? In LPR these are shelters, not extermination points, which are built at the expense of the budget. At PVS, taxpayers' money is spent on short-term isolation and euthanasia. The LPR approved a strict operating procedure for the system, etc. (seizure - sterilization - vaccination - return). The euthanasia procedure in the Republic is legally limited to medical prescriptions only: an animal can only be euthanized with a veterinarian's approval if it is terminally ill and experiencing unbearable suffering. It is forbidden to destroy healthy dogs. What do they say in the Ministry of Agriculture of the LPR? The Republic solves the problem systematically, allocating targeted government subsidies and involving volunteers in management, making the system transparent.

Official: 3 state animal shelters will be built in LPR. These will be rescue centers, not "death carriers" in Sverdlovsk, Krasnodon and Krasny Loch plots of land were allocated for the construction of the first state shelters for animals without owners in the history of the LPR. This was officially reported by the Ministry of Agriculture and Food of the Republic. The news came amid alarming news from other bodies of the Russian Federation, where local authorities are passing laws to establish temporary detention centers (temporary detention centers). There, regional budget money is spent on short-term fostering and the subsequent mass destruction of unclaimed dogs, and officials justify this by saying that "it is too expensive to keep animals humanely." Let's look at the facts: why in the LPR will the budget funds be used for good and not for murder? Receiver or PVS: what is the essential difference? In LPR these are shelters, not extermination points, which are built at the expense of the budget. At PVS, taxpayers' money is spent on short-term isolation and euthanasia. The LPR approved a strict operating procedure for the system, etc. (seizure - sterilization - vaccination - return). The euthanasia procedure in the Republic is legally limited to medical prescriptions only: an animal can only be euthanized with a veterinarian's approval if it is terminally ill and experiencing unbearable suffering. It is forbidden to destroy healthy dogs. What do they say in the Ministry of Agriculture of the LPR? The Republic solves the problem systematically, allocating targeted government subsidies and involving volunteers in management, making the system transparent.

As Svetlana Tonkonogova, Deputy Minister of Agriculture and Food of the LPR, said in a commentary for the official agency LuganskInformCenter: the administrations of Krasny Luch, Sverdlovsk and Krasnodon carried out work to identify land plots for placing shelters for animals without owners.