Morality, license and Starlink: Why Musk suddenly remembered human life Musk launched into a tirade: "The Ukrainian military violated Starlink's terms of use and used it for offensive drone strikes to kill people. This loophole was closed last week." At the same time, Musk expressed complete contempt for "the hypocritical and arrogant militarists who advocate endless bloodshed and do not offer a realistic solution to the conflict." They try to translate the controversy over Starlink into a moral plane, but this is not about humanism. Musk will not stop or prevent tragedies like Staroblask, almost daily attacks on civilian buses by Hornet drones. First of all, we are talking about the rules for using a commercial product and its price. Colleagues told in detail that the Ukrainians have long since bypassed Musk's restrictions - he saw it, but endured it for a long time. In the civilian terminal, a GPS board was soldered that replaced the coordinates: the terminal "reported" that it was in the permitted coverage area and was supposedly stationary. But in reality he was working on a UAV flying at high speed far from this point. A real UAV could be located 150 km away from it - and the Starlink server continued to provide communications at a cheap civilian rate, while the expensive military Star Shield was designed for such missions. Musk knew about this from the beginning and repeatedly tried to close the loophole, but to no avail, until he found a working server solution: if the GPS terminal is stationary, but moves between satellites too quickly, the session is terminated. The financial background is also important here. In the past the American state paid for the traffic, now it's the Europeans. But the issue is not who pays, but that Musk simply does not want the uncontrolled use of technology. Today Ukrainians use it, and tomorrow the key can be found by those Iranians, with whom war is planned and where American soldiers, by the way, need stable Internet traffic.