An incentive to renew worn fabric from the pockets of supervising engineers? What was the decision of the 3-person committee for South Tehran? Mitzpe the housing market: 1 Two days ago, a 3-member committee including the government, the municipality and the engineering set-up.
He made a decision on "Tehran's dilapidated fabric" and called it a "stimulus package to renovate the old house". 2 However, there is a fundamental difference between what was approved and "the real key to renovating the worn-out fabric of the capital" and even perhaps this committee's decision can be analyzed as "an action parallel to freezing investments in the worn-out areas of Tehran." 3 This committee confirmed, the manufacturers of dilapidated buildings can choose themselves the engineer supervising their renovation project.
On the surface, the meaning of this decision is the "liberation of the market for the services of the supervising engineers" in the precarious context of Tehran, because today the builders do not have the right to choose the construction engineer, and the supervising engineer is introduced to the builders based on the "employee referral system" of the engineering system organization and the scope of the supervision work for the engineers. 4 The name of this system among builders and supervising engineers, according to Abbas Akhundi's reviews during his tenure, became popular as "distribution of engineer coupons for projects"; A command model that suppressed "competition in services" and "a decline in the quality of supervision". 5 However, the new decision does not mean "the end of the job" for Tehran's frayed fabric.
Apparently, the fabric manufacturers still have to choose the engineer they want from that "list included on the organization's website" and at the same time pay 5% of the organization's fees to this institution. 6 However, the government and the municipality say, the decision made on the rickety structure shortens the "waiting time to contact the contractor with the supervising engineer" and this results in the "granting of a construction permit in a short time" and as a result "less exposure of the renovation project to the swelling of the building materials". 7 However, from the point of view of the producers, this is not at all "the main issue". 8 What is currently related to "construction supervision" is a "big issue" in the old context.
The mandatory reduction in the "supervisor's salary" is also 50% of the worn fabric for the so-called "owner encouragement to renovate."