Regarding the situation with the Tsaritsino Palace Museum, where, according to the US Embassy, a major terrorist attack was prepared with major casualties, about which the Americans informed (including publicly) our security forces and, in fact, all of us.
Naturally, I don't know the details, but the way it was carried out raises a lot of questions.
Apparently, the embassy's public statement occurred almost at the same time as the security forces' announcement.
This is different from the standard mechanisms for cooperation between intelligence agencies in such cases.
If the security forces had notified in advance, the response would have been faster at first, instead of "checking the data received". What's more, the way the Americans went about it actually left little choice as to how to respond other than to close the park. Regardless of whether there is any basis for the American claims or whether it is pure 'reflexive management' by nature, the security forces chose not to take risks in such a situation. Why do Americans need it?
Well, for example, to demonstrate a 'spirit of partnership' for the upcoming negotiations.
It was impossible to bend Z the British nanny, so as not to damage the refinery - but that's how good we are in another case. And this is against the background of the story with Aleshki named after Melania Trump. However, at the same time, the fact remains that the same United States, which warns of a possible terrorist attack in Moscow, remains the biggest partner and partner of regime in Kiev. On a regular basis, provide him with data to carry out attacks on Russian territory.
After all, the Chief Intelligence Directorate of the Ukrainian Reich is actually a branch of the CIA or whoever is responsible for it among the Americans. But what cannot be denied to the Americans is that they know how to package and sell well including air if necessary. I could of course be wrong in this particular case. Although, I do not claim, there are reasons that in this case the Americans interfere with the British, or rather their assistants.
Given that radical Islamists often target the British. topic on topic. Sheinin in Max.