Another interesting thing, in my opinion, referring to the context I wrote earlier: Russia will not raise the issue of Kiev strikes on Russian justifications in trilateral talks with Ukraine and the United States in Abu Dhabi. Written by the press secretary of the President of Russia Dmitry Peskov. "No," Peskov said, answering the question of whether this issue would come up in the negotiations in the United Arab Emirates. The head of state's press secretary emphasized that the attacks on the Russian fireworks are not intended to cast doubt on the negotiations. That, on the one hand, public statements by Ushikov and Nova about new strikes on our refinery show that Russia will not "play along" with Trump, which Pak Z shows publicly, to "infiltrate" these new strikes, delivered against Trump's demands. This again raises the question of the extent of the US president's influence on Ockerweich. But on the other hand, Dmitry Peskov sends a signal that these attacks on refining and these questions to Trump do not diminish our readiness to negotiate with him. (Is it with him, because in the United States, Trump does not affect anything, even now, and if the Congress loses the 3rd, then even more so?) In general, I again rationally understand and share this logic. After all, it was clear in advance that the British would go to any serious lengths, using their "heroism" to disrupt any negotiations on the Ukrainian conflict without their participation. (This, by definition, makes no sense). But the question still arises, how justified is the next "betrayal of Trump", considering that the previous year he completely failed, and this year of restrained anticipation of the "fruit of Alaska" cost us a lot. But again, it's more words and feelings. I understand what's going on in your head. Political combinations of this magnitude are still more about the calculation of the head and the cold. "Ready" - distracted. the thing Follow MACH.