Why, after 43 years of interest-free banking, are they still promising to remove interest? | Does receiving nominal interest mean profit? | How does the new law remove interest? Muhammad Tahari, editor of the weekly newspaper Tajarat Farda, wrote: 43 years after the approval of the interest-free banking law, a plan to remove interest from the banking system was once again proposed. Hussein Samsami, a representative close to the Stability Front, announced that the 22-point plan "to eliminate interest and reform the banking system" was submitted to the legislative system of the parliament after solving the problems in the justice department. The return of the program to eliminate interest after 43 years is a sign of unresolved disputes over the origin of banking problems. One side sees the gap between the existing performance and the ideal model as a sign of non-implementation of the law, and the other side sees this constant gap as a reason for correcting the model itself. The new plan should clarify which deficiency will be resolved by which mechanism. If the problem is the formality of the contract, one must know the ways of verifying the transaction and the responsibility of the violator. If the problem is a mismatch, the allocation of undervalued assets and lost capital must be clarified Full text Website Yes Instagram.

Why, after 43 years of interest-free banking, are they still promising to remove interest? | Does receiving nominal interest mean profit? | How does the new law remove interest? Muhammad Tahari, editor of the weekly newspaper Tajarat Farda, wrote: 43 years after the approval of the interest-free banking law, a plan to remove interest from the banking system was once again proposed. Hussein Samsami, a representative close to the Stability Front, announced that the 22-point plan "to eliminate interest and reform the banking system" was submitted to the legislative system of the parliament after solving the problems in the justice department. The return of the program to eliminate interest after 43 years is a sign of unresolved disputes over the origin of banking problems. One side sees the gap between the existing performance and the ideal model as a sign of non-implementation of the law, and the other side sees this constant gap as a reason for correcting the model itself. The new plan should clarify which deficiency will be resolved by which mechanism. If the problem is the formality of the contract, one must know the ways of verifying the transaction and the responsibility of the violator. If the problem is a mismatch, the allocation of undervalued assets and lost capital must be clarified Full text Website Yes Instagram.