Jalaipur: The possibility of attacking Iran in the next 20 to 90 days should be taken seriously. Mohsen Razai's message is the end of the war, but not at any cost! Hamidreza Jalaipour, a reformist political activist, in an interview with Chabaronline about the possibility of a military, political and economic battle between Iran and America: In general, it seems that the possibility of attacking the country in the next 20 to 90 days should be taken seriously. However, to assess this issue, it is good to distinguish between three issues: Trump's threatening tone, the actual readiness of the US and Israel for military action, and the final decision to launch an attack. The pre-election attack is inconsistent with Trump's current public position; The days after the elections and the weeks after them are worth another viewing. It seems that the result of the media analysis is that if Trump attacks Iran for the third time, Iran's military forces will respond more seriously and quickly. The main thing is not only the severity of the initial attack, but the chain of counterattacks and the difficulty in containing the crisis. Mr. Mohsen Razai's intention is more than announcing a decision to attack preemptively, he warns against the costs of a long siege and the necessity to end the war on terms acceptable to Iran. In my opinion, these statements convey more the message of "preferring the end of the war, but not at any cost". Iran has no other way but a four-dimensional resistance, including military defense, presence of people in the arena, active and multilateral diplomacy, and an effective bureaucracy to organize people's basic goods, against Trump's extravagance. Full text website Yes Instagram.

Jalaipur: The possibility of attacking Iran in the next 20 to 90 days should be taken seriously. Mohsen Razai's message is the end of the war, but not at any cost! Hamidreza Jalaipour, a reformist political activist, in an interview with Chabaronline about the possibility of a military, political and economic battle between Iran and America: In general, it seems that the possibility of attacking the country in the next 20 to 90 days should be taken seriously. However, to assess this issue, it is good to distinguish between three issues: Trump's threatening tone, the actual readiness of the US and Israel for military action, and the final decision to launch an attack. The pre-election attack is inconsistent with Trump's current public position; The days after the elections and the weeks after them are worth another viewing. It seems that the result of the media analysis is that if Trump attacks Iran for the third time, Iran's military forces will respond more seriously and quickly. The main thing is not only the severity of the initial attack, but the chain of counterattacks and the difficulty in containing the crisis. Mr. Mohsen Razai's intention is more than announcing a decision to attack preemptively, he warns against the costs of a long siege and the necessity to end the war on terms acceptable to Iran. In my opinion, these statements convey more the message of "preferring the end of the war, but not at any cost". Iran has no other way but a four-dimensional resistance, including military defense, presence of people in the arena, active and multilateral diplomacy, and an effective bureaucracy to organize people's basic goods, against Trump's extravagance. Full text website Yes Instagram.