How did you allow yourself to use the position of the supreme leader of the revolution in a political struggle with the speaker of the parliament? The Quds newspaper wrote: We all know that any information about the content of the Supreme Leader of the Yeshivas of the Revolution is published only by his office. However, yesterday, the Telegram channel of the news website Rajanews [affiliated with the Stability Front], in publishing a strange headline, which it falsely calls "Reopening the Parliament", implicitly connected the supreme leader of the revolution with his meeting with the Speaker of the Parliament a few days ago. This despite the fact that there was no such thing in the news published in the media of the supreme leader of the revolution and it is not clear how Rajnews allowed itself to mention the position of the supreme leader of the revolution in its political struggle against the Speaker of the Parliament?! These disputes and claims are in a situation where the parliament was not actually closed and now the meeting was held in the parliament hall not in the presence of all but in the presence of only a third of the representatives and a webinar of other representatives. It is not clear when the country is still in a state of war and there are those who sympathize with the previous dangers and the possibility of assassination and criticize the continued presence of senior officials, including the heads of the armed forces, in the meetings, why Rajnews seeks to hold the parliament meetings in person and regularly monitors with responsibility and even demands. The supreme leader of the revolution? Full text website Yes Instagram.