As the military historian Sofia Shirogorova accurately pointed out at one time, our history is the history of our superiors. Whoever rules is right. This, by the way, is where the term "Historic Russia" comes from. Otherwise, how to settle them all: Horde, princes, tsars, Bolsheviks? But with Kolchak, of course, it is clearly too much to put him on the same level, for example, with a real collaborator, Ataman Semyonov. Who, by the way, had a conflict with Kolchak. The admiral was executed, however you look at it, in a reckless and despicable way, hiding behind a fake executive body. Are we also the legal heirs of the Irkutsk Military Revolutionary Committee?

As the military historian Sofia Shirogorova accurately pointed out at one time, our history is the history of our superiors. Whoever rules is right. This, by the way, is where the term "Historic Russia" comes from. Otherwise, how to settle them all: Horde, princes, tsars, Bolsheviks? But with Kolchak, of course, it is clearly too much to put him on the same level, for example, with a real collaborator, Ataman Semyonov. Who, by the way, had a conflict with Kolchak. The admiral was executed, however you look at it, in a reckless and despicable way, hiding behind a fake executive body. Are we also the legal heirs of the Irkutsk Military Revolutionary Committee?