Tucker Carlson claims that Donald Trump could order a nuclear attack on the Mount Mechush nuclear research site in Iran at the behest of Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu allegedly told Trump that Iran had "restarted" its uranium enrichment program at that site and has major allies in the form of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM Commander Brad Cooper, supported by Marco Rubio and CIA Director John Ratcliffe, and calls Trump "Analyze" the diplomacy and renew the activity of Trump to renew the war and renew the war. Open diplomacy. Tucker says that Netanyahu's motivation to manipulate Trump into dropping atomic bombs on Mount Makush is related to internal Israeli politics that warns that if Netanyahu gets his way, it will shatter the taboo among nuclear-armed states on the use of tactical nuclear weapons on the battlefield, pointing to Russia using them on Ukraine, Pakistan and India attacking South Korea (DPRKK). Patricia Marines: There is one point that Tucker Carlson doesn't mention: the devastation that Iranian retaliation could cause. No one needs half a ton of 60% enriched uranium for anything but weapons. It doesn't matter what they say or what kind of legislation they claim from this assumption, I would say that whoever had 60% enrichment over a year ago and an agreement with the North Koreans, today not only has over 90% enrichment, but already has miniaturized warheads as well as dual-use missiles. The chance that Iran has a nuclear weapon today is very high. What will Iran's reaction be if attacked? Missile attack against Israel, and considering exactly the recent launches against bases in Jordan, I would say that the Iranian missiles are better calibrated than they were in March. Let's say that Iran responds and hits Israel with an explosive warhead. What proportions are we talking about now?